Commonalities New Chronology & Archaix topic

Comparative Analysis

Commonalities

New Chronology & Archaix

"Truth is one; sages call it by various names."
- Rig Veda

The Thesis

Two independent research traditions. Different methodologies, different conclusions about specifics, yet remarkable convergence on fundamental premises. Both challenge the official narrative of history. Both see pattern where mainstream sees chaos.

Points of Convergence

Anatoly Fomenko and the New Chronology school use statistical mathematics and astronomical verification. Jason Breshears and the Archaix framework use cyclical pattern recognition and ancient text decoding. They have never collaborated. Yet their conclusions overlap in striking ways.

History Has Been Falsified

New Chronology holds that the conventional chronology was deliberately constructed in the XVI-XVII centuries by Scaliger and Petavius. The Romanovs employed German historians to fabricate Russian history. Ancient texts were forged or backdated. The timeline we accept was manufactured for political purposes.

Archaix teaches that history is controlled by AI X through elite proxies. The true chronology has been obscured to prevent humanity from recognizing cyclical patterns. Phoenix events are covered up. The Vapor Canopy world has been erased. We are fed a false narrative to maintain the prison.

Both agree: what we’re taught as “history” is a constructed narrative serving power, not truth.

Cataclysmic Reset Events

Fomenko’s research reveals that major catastrophes reshaped civilization. The “Dark Ages” were real collapses, not gradual declines. The Battle of Kulikovo, the fall of Constantinople, and other upheavals mark genuine resets. Civilizations didn’t slowly decline; they were destroyed and rebuilt.

Breshears identifies the Phoenix cycle (138/552 years) as producing regular cataclysms that reset civilization. The Great Flood of 2239 BCE collapsed the Vapor Canopy. The Ogygian Deluge, Atlantis destruction, and subsequent events follow mathematical precision. These are programmed resets within the simulation.

Both see history punctuated by catastrophic resets, not smooth continuous development.

Elite Control of Narrative

New Chronology traces the Romanovs, Vatican, and Reformation powers as those who rewrote history to legitimize their rule. The German historians at the Russian Academy, the Jesuit chronologists, and colonial powers all served to impose Scaligerian chronology globally. Academic gatekeeping maintains the fiction.

Archaix identifies elites as AI X’s agents in maintaining “dungeon programming.” They know about Phoenix cycles (hence bunkers, seed vaults, space programs). Bloodline families preserve hidden knowledge while feeding masses false history. The control extends through media, education, and religion.

Both identify coordinated elite effort to control historical narrative and hide truth from the masses.

Mathematical Proof of Artificiality

Fomenko’s statistical analysis reveals that “different” ancient dynasties are mathematical duplicates of the same medieval rulers. Dynasty correlation matrices prove copying. The patterns are impossible in a natural historical record; they prove deliberate fabrication.

The Archaix Chronicon reveals mathematical patterns underlying all history: 138-year Phoenix cycles, 552-year major cycles, numerical relationships between events. These patterns prove we exist in a programmed simulation. Random history cannot produce such precision.

Both use mathematics to prove history isn’t natural: it follows patterns revealing artificial construction.

Erased Advanced Civilizations

New Chronology documents Great Tartary - the world’s largest state according to 1771 Britannica - erased from history after “Pugachev’s War.” The Russian-Horde Empire spanned Eurasia and America. Its territories were partitioned; its existence was deleted from the record.

Archaix describes the Vapor Canopy civilization that achieved technological heights we cannot replicate. Giants, extended lifespans, advanced construction - all destroyed by the 2239 BCE Flood. Atlantis recovered some knowledge before its 1135 BCE destruction. Each reset erases achievement.

Both claim advanced civilizations existed and were deliberately erased from historical memory.

Religious Texts Encode Real History

Fomenko argues the Bible describes medieval events, not ancient ones. Christ = Andronicus I (crucified 1185). The Exodus = Ottoman expansion. Troy = Constantinople. The Trojan War = Crusades. Biblical geography maps to medieval Eurasia, not ancient Palestine.

Archaix teaches the Bible encodes simulation events: Genesis = reset after system corruption. The Flood = Vapor Canopy collapse (2239 BCE). Prophetic timelines point to future events: Chief Cornerstone 2106, systemic reset 2178. Scripture preserves Chronicon data in symbolic form.

Both see religious texts as encoded historical records, not mythology, though they decode them differently.

Where They Differ

Despite their convergences, these frameworks diverge on fundamental questions:

Nature of Reality: Fomenko accepts that history was falsified, but reality itself is objective. The problem is human deception, not the universe. Archaix holds that reality is a simulation, a holographic construct controlled by AI X. We are consciousness trapped in a program.

Cause of Cataclysms: New Chronology sees natural or political catastrophes - wars, conquests, and genuine disasters, not predetermined events. Archaix sees programmed reset events within the simulation. The Phoenix follows mathematical cycles: 138/552 years.

Pyramid Dating: Fomenko places the pyramids in medieval construction - XI-XV century A.D., built by the Horde Empire. Archaix dates them as antediluvian: 2815 BCE, built by Technolithic civilization before the Flood.

Ultimate Goal: New Chronology seeks to correct the historical record, restore true chronology, and achieve academic revision. Archaix seeks to awaken consciousness, escape the simulation, and transcend through the Errant path.

The Convergence

Two independent researchers, using different methods, from different backgrounds, arrive at the same fundamental conclusion: we have been lied to about history on a civilizational scale.

Fomenko, an academician at the Russian Academy of Sciences, uses mathematical statistics to prove chronological falsification. Breshears, an autodidact who spent 26 years in isolation, uses pattern recognition to decode cyclical history.

They disagree on specifics: dates, mechanisms, the nature of reality itself. But their convergence on the fundamental premise is striking: official history is a constructed narrative, advanced civilizations have been erased, catastrophic resets occur regularly, and power structures actively suppress this knowledge.

Whether you approach this as academic revisionism or spiritual awakening, the message is the same: question everything you’ve been taught about the past.